Page 1 2 

Moderators: Admin
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Knows the ropes Member
Registered:: October 04, 2006
Posts: 6745
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
CHIEF!! I choose not to go down the path of this argument... I plea the fifth Cool
Executive Member
Location: Long Island
Registered:: March 27, 2001
Posts: 36209
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Start pleading to your elected officials to oppose congesstion pricing.
Knows the ropes Member
Registered:: October 04, 2006
Posts: 6745
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Bro, CP will not surface on the GT city council agenda in the near future Wink
Knows the ropes Member
Registered:: April 25, 2004
Posts: 6724
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
It will be back!
Member
Registered:: April 04, 2008
Posts: 2076
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Congestion Pricing deserves to die the violent death it suffered in Albany, New York, because, plain and simple, it is just another form of TAXATION.

Mayor Bloomberg thought he could pull wool over our eyes when he argued that the $354 million federal grant would go towards the MTA if Albany had approved CP, but what Bloomberg has not admitted is that for a major transportation entity like MTA, that $354 million is a drop in its budget bucket. That money would be sapped up in nanoseconds by contractors who do not deliver quality or quantity, but the $8 toll fee would remain forever and could likely go up with time.

The first fall-out from this rejection by Albany will be the MTA's declaration of new increases in fares, cutting back or freezing new hires, and demanding union give backs when the MTA and the 38,000 employees union start new contract negotiations later in the year.
Knows the ropes Member
Registered:: April 25, 2004
Posts: 6724
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Comm, while you are correct that the $354 mil was a drop, it was the first drop to enhance the system in preparation for CP. The bill if enacted would have allowed the monies collected from CP to go directly into the MTA’s coffers. What was woefully wrong about CP was that the committee did not look beyond traffic volumes to the other problems causing congestions; problems like double parking, pedestrians going against lights, construction etc.

Growth in Manhattan will take placed and it will become more densely packed…the idea behind CP is a good one but the plan needed to be enhanced further. I think Silver was wrong.
Member
Registered:: April 04, 2008
Posts: 2076
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Petal29,

Let's be practical. If you live in New York and are familiar with Manhattan, you will know there are 14 'avenues' running north to south from the East River to the Hudson River, and many, many 'streets' run east to west from lower Manhattan all the way up to Harlem.

The Congestion Pricing plan calls for charging drivers entering Manhattan below 60 Street, so are we talking here about each of the downtown avenues plus Broadway that intersect with 60 Street will have manned or unmanned by toll booths or will each be equipped with cameras like those that take pictures of your car’s plate when you run a red light?

I read yesterday where it was stated that cameras were being considered as part of the plan, so that if you did not pay the $8 within four days, you will be sent a $65 ticket in the mail, so maybe this was one way of working the system. No one knows for sure.

Second, with 60 Street being the entrance and exit road for the Queensboro Bridge, I am sure drivers would love nothing better than to beat the system by crossing the Queensboro Bridge @ 60 Street and then turning north or away from lower Manhattan, looking for parking wherever this can be found and then taking subway trains into lower Manhattan. They will be minutes at most away from their vehicles, but then areas above 60 Street will eventually become congested, leading to extension of CP beyond 60 Street. It will never stop.

I conclude by contending that CP would have been a form of taxation that would have driven up prices for goods and services below 60 Street and threaten existence of lots of struggling small businesses. MTA, meanwhile, needs to reduce its top heavy management, consolidate its multiple office operations and give out jobs to its internal departments instead of ‘outside contractors’ who make a financial killing off the MTA.
Knows the ropes Member
Registered:: April 25, 2004
Posts: 6724
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
I could go on about this but don’t have the time right now…there will be no toll booths in the city…that’s ludicrous and everyone coming off the bridge would have been tolled.

Anyway just came on to say that Shelly Silver is actually proposing a tax on all income earners above the 100K mark. It will NOW be a tax and we will all be paying for those commuting into Manhattan. Fair? I say not…
Executive Member
Location: Long Island
Registered:: March 27, 2001
Posts: 36209
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Yesssssssssssssssss
Thank all of you for your support wavey
When I returned from Guyana last evening that was the first thing my wife greeted me with.

This afternoon I have to attend the NYS Messenger Courier Association.

May God bless Mr Silver and all others who stopped Mr Bloomberg in his tracks..
Member
Registered:: September 05, 2006
Posts: 4904
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by Chief:
Yesssssssssssssssss
Thank all of you for your support wavey
When I returned from Guyana last evening that was the first thing my wife greeted me with.

This afternoon I have to attend the NYS Messenger Courier Association.

May God bless Mr Silver and all others who stopped Mr Bloomberg in his tracks..



Was that wife #1,2,3,4 or 5?

Rumor has it that you were in GY lobbying for polygamy.
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2  
 


This Forum is owned by Guyana News and Information and is jointly operated with guyanafriends.com
By registering on this site, you agree to the terms and conditions of our Privacy Statement - Terms of Use.

This website takes no responsibility for statements posted by participants on the Forum.

The textual, graphic, audio and audiovisual material on our sites is protected by copyright law.
You may not copy, distribute, or use these materials except as necessary for your personal, non-commercial use.
Any trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Rules of Use:

In order to guarantee enjoyment for all visitors to our Discussion Forums, we ask that you observe a few simple rules:

Refrain from using foul or abusive language. (Using profanity in disguise is not acceptable).

Consider before you post whether your message may cause unnecessary upset for any other user.

Respect the religious and political beliefs of others.

You should not post anything which is illegal, in breach of Copyright, defamatory or otherwise unlawful.