Guyana News and Information Discussion Forums
Political Discussions
Guyanese victim of hate crime|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
|
UK Correspondent Registered:: November 03, 2003
Posts: 18750
|
Assailant with "outrageous" record gets 60 days in jail
Posted By GALEN EAGLE/Examiner Court Writer Posted 23 mins ago Joel Bollers said he never imagined he'd be a victim of a hate crime, not in Peterborough. He nonetheless found himself telling court yesterday how he felt after a panhandler shouted a series of racial slurs before sucker-punching him in the face last summer. "I have endured a lot of racial comments, but never have I thought I would be assaulted in the middle of the day in downtown Peterborough," Bollers told Ontario Court of Justice. Mr. Justice Lorne Chester sentenced Boller's assailant, 38-year-old Kevin Dwyer, to 60 days in jail and placed him on probation for 18 months. Chester said with Dwyer's extensive criminal record, he was lucky the Crown and defence had struck a deal. "You're lucky this is coming to me by way of a joint submission. Otherwise I would give you more than 60 days," Chester said. "Your record is outrageous." Bollers, who was born in Guyana, passed Dwyer begging for money on the street on the way to his bank on George Street July 17. The two had a previous dispute over money and Dwyer made several derogatory comments, court heard. After Bollers finished his banking and passed Dwyer a second time, the man continued with the racial comments and punched Bollers in the right eye. Defence lawyer David Ross said his client's attack was not racially motivated, but concerned a dispute about money. "Words were exchanged in the heat of the moment," Ross said. Bollers said he has no doubt the attack was a hate crime and said he has heard Dwyer bragging about the attack to others. "I can't believe this would happen," he told The Examiner. "Right downtown in the middle of the day." In addition to the jail term, Chester ordered Dwyer to provide police a sample of his DNA and prohibited him from possessing firearms for 10 years. geagle@peterboroughexaminer.com Article ID# 978874 http://www.thepeterboroughexaminer.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=978874 |
|
Executive Member Location: home
Registered:: March 22, 2001
Posts: 30933
|
cheap GUyanese...he coulda hand the man ah 2 bob
|
|
Amber's GNI Gentleman Location: canada
Registered:: February 17, 2005
Posts: 10318
|
Racism is alive and well in good ole Canada, a country that didnt have slavery.
|
|
Member Registered:: July 15, 2007
Posts: 1627
|
That guyanese man must have been Nuff's family, a real black man would have buss his ass on the spot.
|
|
Elite Member Location: Wherever I may be.
Registered:: October 15, 1999
Posts: 24626
|
Under French rule
The first recorded slave purchase occurred in New France in the region known today as Quebec in 1628. The purchase was of a young boy from Madagascar, who was given the name Olivier Le Jeune. The citizens of New France received slaves as gifts from their allies among native peoples. Many of these slaves were prisoners taken in raids against the villages of the Fox nation, a tribe that was an ancient rival of the Miami People and their Algonquian allies.[1] By the early 1700s, Africans began arriving in greater numbers to New France, mainly as slaves of the French aristocracy. At the time of the British conquest, there were more than 1,000 slaves living in Quebec. Native ("pani") slaves were easier to obtain and thus more numerous than African slaves in New France, but were less valued. The average native slave died at 18, and the average African slave died at 25.[2] [edit] Under British rule Slavery continued in Canada after the British conquest of 1760 much as before. The 1763 Treaty of Paris explicitly stated that the status of all slaves would remain as under the French, stating "The Negroes and Panis of both sexes shall remain, in their quality of slaves, in the possession of the French and Canadians to whom they belong; they shall be at liberty to keep them in their service in the colony or sell them." The Quebec Act of 1774, which returned the colony to French civil law, reaffirmed the right of colonists to own, buy, and sell slaves.[2] The British brought printing presses to the colony and with them the first newspapers were published in Canada. These contain frequent mention of slaves that were for sale or had run away, from which historians have learnt that slaves were often bilingual, typically worked as domestics, farm workers, or skilled labourers, and were often described as "mulatto". This shows that all descendants of slaves, even if one parent was a free, white man (generally the mother's owner), were also condemned to slavery. It is also clear from these ads that slaves were not content with their lot, and often insulted their owners, deliberately broke items or worked slowly, ran away, or even committed suicide. Slaves also rose up against their owners; a Native slave named Charles was deported to Martinique after leading a slave revolt in Niagara.[2] Just after the American Revolution ended in 1783, British Loyalists brought over 2,000 African American slaves[3] to British Canada. A few others were taken to Prince Edward Island, Cape Breton Island, and Newfoundland. This was encouraged by the British colonial government, who in the Imperial Act of 1790 waived import duties of all "Negros, household furniture, utensils of husbandry, or clothing" to encourage the immigration of English speakers.[2] Historian Marcel Trudel has recorded 4,092 slaves throughout Canadian history, of which 2,692 were aboriginal people, owned mostly by the French, and 1400 blacks owned mostly by the British, together owned by approximately 1400 masters. The region of Montreal dominated with 2,077 slaves, compared to 1,059 for Quebec City overall and 114 for Trois-Rivières. Several marriages took place between French colonists and slaves: 31 unions with aboriginal slaves and 8 with black slaves. In 1793, the administration of Lieutenant Governor John Graves Simcoe passed the Act Against Slavery in Upper Canada that allowed for gradual abolition: slaves already in the province would remain enslaved until death, no new slaves could be brought into Upper Canada, and children born to female slaves would be freed at age 25. This ensured the eventual end of slavery in Upper Canada, although as it diminished the sale value of slaves within the province it also resulted in slaves being sold to the United States. Some slaves in Upper Canada also ran away south to the free states, thus gaining their liberty. By 1797, courts began to rule in favour of slaves who complained of poor treatment from their owners.[2] These developments were resisted in Lower Canada until 1803, when Chief Justice William Osgoode ruled that slavery was not compatible with British law. This historic judgement, while it did not abolish slavery, set free 300 slaves and resulted in the rapid decline of the practise of slavery. However, slavery remained in Upper and Lower Canada until 1834 when the British Parliament's Slavery Abolition Act finally abolished slavery in all parts of the British Empire. Most of the emancipated slaves of African descent in Canada were then sent to settle Freetown in Sierra Leone and those that remained primarily ended up in segregated communities such as Africville outside Halifax, Nova Scotia. (Today there are four remaining slave cemeteries in Canada: in St.-Armand, Quebec, Shelburne, Nova Scotia and Priceville and Dresden in Ontario.) Around the time of the Emancipation, the Underground Railroad network was established in the United States, particularly Ohio, where slaves would cross into the Northern States over the Ohio River en route to various settlements and towns in Upper Canada (known as Canada West from 1841 to 1867). |
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
Guyana News and Information Discussion Forums
Political Discussions
Guyanese victim of hate crime
The textual, graphic, audio and audiovisual material on our sites is protected by copyright law.
You may not copy, distribute, or use these materials except as necessary for your personal, non-commercial use.
Any trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
In order to guarantee enjoyment for all visitors to our Discussion Forums, we ask that you observe a few simple rules:
Refrain from using foul or abusive language. (Using profanity in disguise is not acceptable).
Consider before you post whether your message may cause unnecessary upset for any other user.
Respect the religious and political beliefs of others.
You should not post anything which is illegal, in breach of Copyright, defamatory or otherwise unlawful.

