Guyana.org    Guyana News and Information Discussion Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Religion    Al Haj Mujtaba Nasir: Western clothes dehumanise women into sex objects
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Senior Member
Registered:: February 28, 2005
Posts: 10450
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by limer:
quote:
Originally posted by limer:
quote:
Originally posted by Petal29:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by limer:
Speaking of intolerance, I think that this reply should be to ICIP - though you might see different.



Feel free to copy the post and address it to ICIP if you so wish. Did you also see where I mentioned that “he replied to you in kind.”

The first post in this thread was discussing a specific topic which was how a woman should be covered according to Nasir’s view of Islam. ICIP then poses a question based on said post and you respond and he posts another response again related to the first post asking you if you got his point whereby you CHOSE to bring in stone worshipping as you are often wont to do when you are surrounded by issues for which you may or may not have an answer. I do not know your reasoning for doing such but I am merely pointing out that you are displaying your biases against other religions, especially Hinduism while failing to defend what you believe in (here I’m assuming you believe what Nasir’s argument espouses). Take a lesson from ksazma and defend what you believe in and why you believe in it without resorting to attacking Hinduism.


My statement was that I find Hinduism illogical...and I do. How do you interpret this as attacking Hinduism is beyond me.

And how come you don't you get upset with ICIP for his continuous barage against Islam? No, you don't have to answer that.


how dare you argue with the expert on all matters.???
D2
Executive Member
Location: NY
Registered:: February 25, 1999
Posts: 31761
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by SuperMike:
Nuff respect to Nasir.
I am not surprised that you chose to respect a misogynist who defends his hate on grounds it is directed by God
Senior Member
Registered:: February 28, 2005
Posts: 10450
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by D2:
quote:
Originally posted by SuperMike:
Nuff respect to Nasir.
I am not surprised that you chose to respect a misogynist who defends his hate on grounds it is directed by God


Nuff respect to D2 too...i tryin fe respect everybody opinion...i don't have to agree.
Member
Registered:: August 04, 2005
Posts: 2921
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by D2:
quote:
Originally posted by limer:
My friend, you made a statement that these stones/idols - whatever you want to call them - is in the Kaaba...I'm simply setting the record straight...that there is none.
The black stone is still there.

It does not represent God...
Member
Registered:: March 21, 2007
Posts: 2302
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by limer:
It does not represent God...
This is propaganda!
Member
Registered:: August 04, 2005
Posts: 2921
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by D2:
quote:
Originally posted by limer:
quote:
Originally posted by limer:
quote:
Originally posted by Petal29:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by limer:
Speaking of intolerance, I think that this reply should be to ICIP - though you might see different.



Feel free to copy the post and address it to ICIP if you so wish. Did you also see where I mentioned that “he replied to you in kind.”

The first post in this thread was discussing a specific topic which was how a woman should be covered according to Nasir’s view of Islam. ICIP then poses a question based on said post and you respond and he posts another response again related to the first post asking you if you got his point whereby you CHOSE to bring in stone worshipping as you are often wont to do when you are surrounded by issues for which you may or may not have an answer. I do not know your reasoning for doing such but I am merely pointing out that you are displaying your biases against other religions, especially Hinduism while failing to defend what you believe in (here I’m assuming you believe what Nasir’s argument espouses). Take a lesson from ksazma and defend what you believe in and why you believe in it without resorting to attacking Hinduism.


My statement was that I find Hinduism illogical...and I do. How do you interpret this as attacking Hinduism is beyond me.

And how come you don't you get upset with ICIP for his continuous barage against Islam? No, you don't have to answer that.
If you find it illogical, it means you are attacking its founding suppositions. There is nothing wrong with that. Unfortunately, I do not believe you truly know that are its premises.

I have on numerous occasions confronted ICIP and others on Islam, Christianity, Buddhism,Atheism etc as I see fit. I do not need anyone picking the time or the instance when I chose to take a stand.


I was not addressing you in this reply...
I disagree with your conclusions regarding concluding that something illogical is synonymous with attacking it...

Actually, I find your statement rather illogical...
Member
Registered:: August 04, 2005
Posts: 2921
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by ICIP:
quote:
Originally posted by limer:
It does not represent God...
This is propaganda!


You ought to know the meaning of this word quite well...
Member
Registered:: March 21, 2007
Posts: 2302
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
dara:

What is the significance/symbolism of kissing the stone?
Member
Registered:: August 04, 2005
Posts: 2921
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by ICIP:
quote:
Originally posted by limer:
These stones were used as idols. You can play with words if you like. There are no such "stones" in the Kaaba...

Limer: FYI

Kaaba, Caaba
General Information
Kaaba is the central shrine of Islam, a cube-shaped, one-room stone structure in Mecca, Saudi Arabia. It already attracted pilgrimages as the most important sanctuary (haram) in pre-Muslim Arabia, and the traditional belief that it was built by Abraham and Ishmael (to whom the Arabs trace their descent) was confirmed by the Qur'an (Koran). The annual pilgrimage to the Kaaba takes place in the first ten days of Dhu al-Hijja, the last lunar month of the Islamic calendar. The Black Stone set on the outside of one corner of the structure is solemnly kissed by all pilgrims who can gain access to it. Lesser pilgrimages are performed throughout the year.

For Muslims, the Kaaba is the "House of God," where the divine touches the mundane. It is washed annually and covered with a dark silk cloth. The Kaaba has been greatly expanded since Muhammad's times, a mosque-court having been built around it; recently a gate of solid gold was added.

Fazlur Rahman


I fail to see the relevance...what's your point?
Member
Registered:: March 21, 2007
Posts: 2302
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by limer:
I fail to see the relevance...what's your point?
You are too stupid and brainwashed for rational discourse!
Elite Member
Location: Homeless in New York, Lil ABC dropout!
Registered:: March 22, 1999
Posts: 24147
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
The black stone is a meteorite. Actually there are two meteorites (stones) built into the walls. These are not worshipped but these stones hold great significance, and that's why they were used as corner stones. The stones were never worshipped by the pagans. The pre-islamic pagans had their own gods.
Kissing the stone is a custom; people kiss the walls, the gates, the ground. It has no religious significance. You are not required to kiss any stones at the Hajj.
Senior Member
Location: wherever there is good food
Registered:: February 15, 2007
Posts: 12272
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
TI: it is possible about it being a meteorite, but this is simply a theory. Re its original placement: the Islamic story seems to fit the biblical portrayal of stones being used to mark holy sites..see jacob etc. later Muslim traditon created some stories that were not only fictional, but on the child's level of imagination...
truE also about not being required to kiss any stones..but try explaining that to some of the knudniks who make the hajj...I once sat with a guy who told me it was worship to even look at the stone!!!!
A lot of these things have to do with SYMBOLISM. And this means that the educated academic, the fanatic worshipper, the lukewarm faith follower, the rationalist, the wannabe rationalist theologian might all be at odds when explaining a religious symbol....unfortunately..or perhaps fortunately...religion is what people make of it..ISLAM/HINDUISM/etc can't TALK...only their followers/interpreters can...
Executive Member
Location: home
Registered:: March 22, 2001
Posts: 30821
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by Terry Ishmael:
The black stone is a meteorite. Actually there are two meteorites (stones) built into the walls. These are not worshipped but these stones hold great significance, and that's why they were used as corner stones. The stones were never worshipped by the pagans. The pre-islamic pagans had their own gods.
Kissing the stone is a custom; people kiss the walls, the gates, the ground. It has no religious significance. You are not required to kiss any stones at the Hajj.


but limer said they are no stones
Elite Member
Location: Homeless in New York, Lil ABC dropout!
Registered:: March 22, 1999
Posts: 24147
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
the whole kaaba was built of stones.
D2
Executive Member
Location: NY
Registered:: February 25, 1999
Posts: 31761
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by limer:
quote:
Originally posted by D2:
quote:
Originally posted by limer:
My friend, you made a statement that these stones/idols - whatever you want to call them - is in the Kaaba...I'm simply setting the record straight...that there is none.
The black stone is still there.

It does not represent God...
I did not say it did. I said it is there as part of the iconography of the religion even though there will be serious disputes as the reason for its presence, reverence or if it means anything.
D2
Executive Member
Location: NY
Registered:: February 25, 1999
Posts: 31761
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by limer:


I was not addressing you in this reply...
I disagree with your conclusions regarding concluding that something illogical is synonymous with attacking it...

Actually, I find your statement rather illogical...
You cannot buldoze the load bearing beams of a structure and insist you do not mean for it to fall. If you say Hinduism ( for whatever reason if you actually can articulate them) is illogical, you not only attacked its foundation but called its adherents followers of the absurd.

What you find to be the case and what it is are different things in this instance.
D2
Executive Member
Location: NY
Registered:: February 25, 1999
Posts: 31761
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by Terry Ishmael:
The black stone is a meteorite. Actually there are two meteorites (stones) built into the walls. These are not worshipped but these stones hold great significance, and that's why they were used as corner stones. The stones were never worshipped by the pagans. The pre-islamic pagans had their own gods.
Kissing the stone is a custom; people kiss the walls, the gates, the ground. It has no religious significance. You are not required to kiss any stones at the Hajj.
Stones inclusive of the black one were worshiped by the pagans.
Elite Member
Location: Homeless in New York, Lil ABC dropout!
Registered:: March 22, 1999
Posts: 24147
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
As far as I know, the pagan Arabs worshipped 360 sculpted idols. Some of these idols were destroyed and and some are stored in a sealed cave according to an archaelogist friend over there. At some point they will open a museum and put them on exhibition. The problem is that if they put them on exhibition, opponents will argue that Muslims are worshipping them.
Senior Member
Location: Aragorn
Registered:: June 23, 2006
Posts: 11365
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
I am trying hard to keep off the religion threads ...lol
Elite Member
Location: Homeless in New York, Lil ABC dropout!
Registered:: March 22, 1999
Posts: 24147
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
How come? Yu not feeling well today? (:-))
Senior Member
Location: Aragorn
Registered:: June 23, 2006
Posts: 11365
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by Terry Ishmael:
How come? Yu not feeling well today? (:-))


I am not saying anything ...lol
Senior Member
Location: Every action is judged by intention - Muhammad
Registered:: April 04, 2005
Posts: 10271
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by Pink Panther:
I am not saying anything ...lol


You never do. :-)
Member
Registered:: August 04, 2005
Posts: 2921
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by D2:
quote:
Originally posted by limer:


I was not addressing you in this reply...
I disagree with your conclusions regarding concluding that something illogical is synonymous with attacking it...

Actually, I find your statement rather illogical...
You cannot buldoze the load bearing beams of a structure and insist you do not mean for it to fall. If you say Hinduism ( for whatever reason if you actually can articulate them) is illogical, you not only attacked its foundation but called its adherents followers of the absurd.

What you find to be the case and what it is are different things in this instance.


I bulldozed what? I stated my opinion...I can do that can't I?

I critique my peers work all the time..does that mean I am attacking them when I say it makes no sense to do something this way or that?

Like I said - your conclusion is illogical ( I guess I'm attacking you now,no?)
Member
Registered:: August 04, 2005
Posts: 2921
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by D2:
quote:
Originally posted by Terry Ishmael:
The black stone is a meteorite. Actually there are two meteorites (stones) built into the walls. These are not worshipped but these stones hold great significance, and that's why they were used as corner stones. The stones were never worshipped by the pagans. The pre-islamic pagans had their own gods.
Kissing the stone is a custom; people kiss the walls, the gates, the ground. It has no religious significance. You are not required to kiss any stones at the Hajj.
Stones inclusive of the black one were worshiped by the pagans.


I don't know this to be the case...even if it were, Islam came and put an end to it...
Member
Registered:: August 04, 2005